Photo of Paul FreemanPhoto of Issac Schabes

On August 31, 2022, the White House Council on Environmental Quality (“CEQ”) released instructions to federal agencies for implementing Executive Order (“EO”) 14057 Catalyzing Clean Energy Industries and Jobs Through Federal Sustainability.  As we have covered previously, EO 14057 identified ambitious sustainability goals for federal agencies, including:

  • 100 percent carbon-free electricity by 2030;
  • 100 percent zero-emission vehicle fleet by 2035;
  • net-zero emissions building portfolio by 2045;
  • 65 percent reduction in Greenhouse Gas (“GHG”) Scope 1 and 2 emissions from Federal operations; and
  • net-zero emissions from federal procurement, including a “Buy Clean” policy to promote use of construction materials with lower embodied emissions.

In furtherance of EO 14057, CEQ urges federal agencies, among other initiatives, to “pursue procurement vehicles, including pilot projects . . . that target categories of significant agency spending or have the greatest potential to impact emissions or climate risk.”  This includes recommending that agencies utilize government-wide and shared acquisition vehicles, such as government-wide acquisition contracts (“GWACs”), indefinite delivery/indefinite-quantity (“IDIQ”) contracts, multiple award schedule(“MAS”) contracts, and blanket purchase agreements (“BPAs”) that already include sustainability requirements.

Agencies are also encouraged to “seek information on life-cycle carbon emission and related economic costs . . . of procured products and services” and to establish programs “that incentivize contractors to account for and reduce emissions and climate risks.”  CEQ is further instructing agencies that in conducting competitive procurements, “best value” should be based on “determinations on full life-cycle costs, including measurable costs of environmental impacts in all phases of the product or service life cycle, where possible” and that price should be deemed unreasonable “only when the total life-cycle costs . . . are significantly higher for the sustainable product or service than for the non-sustainable product or service.”  Other procurement priorities for agencies include reducing reliance on single-use plastics and PFAS-containing products, and incorporating Environmental Justice considerations into agency procurement by “determining whether materials are being created, sourced, or procured in a manner that disproportionately and adversely affects communities of color and low-income populations.”

As the Government continues to drive the implementation of these sustainability measures across all agencies, federal contractors should follow these developments closely as these measures may impact the type and cost of a broad range of goods and services that the Government procures.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Paul Freeman Paul Freeman

Paul Freeman is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s New York office and a member of the firm’s Environment & Natural Resources and Government Contracts groups. He brings two decades of diverse experience advising clients in the energy, maritime, and aerospace and defense…

Paul Freeman is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s New York office and a member of the firm’s Environment & Natural Resources and Government Contracts groups. He brings two decades of diverse experience advising clients in the energy, maritime, and aerospace and defense industries on a range of issues, with a primary emphasis on matters involving enforcement defense, litigation, and risk management.

Paul routinely advises clients in response to investigations by, or inquiries from, a range of regulators, primarily the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), and also including the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Internal Revenue Service, the U.S. Department of Defense Inspector General, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and state attorneys general.

Photo of Issac Schabes Issac Schabes

Issac D. Schabes is an associate in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office, where he is a member of the Government Contracts Group.

Prior to joining the firm, Issac clerked for the Honorable Matthew H. Solomson on the U.S. Court of Federal Claims and…

Issac D. Schabes is an associate in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office, where he is a member of the Government Contracts Group.

Prior to joining the firm, Issac clerked for the Honorable Matthew H. Solomson on the U.S. Court of Federal Claims and the Honorable Robert N. McDonald on the Maryland Court of Appeals. Issac received his J.D., magna cum laude, from the University of Maryland Carey School of Law, where he graduated Order of the Coif and served as an executive editor for the Maryland Law Review. He received numerous awards, including the Judge Simon E. Sobeloff Prize for Excellence in Constitutional Law. During law school, Issac was a member of a low-income taxpayer clinic team that successfully appealed an IRS assessment resulting in a substantial tax liability reduction, and also interned for the Honorable Beryl A. Howell, Chief Judge, on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and the Honorable Marvin J. Garbis on the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland.