government contracts

Subscribe to government contracts via RSS
Photo of Issac SchabesPhoto of Cherie OwenPhoto of Christian Curran

When an agency conducts a multiple-award indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity (IDIQ) competition, successful awardees often wonder whether they can protest the agency’s award to other companies at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. For over a decade, the answer has been a murky “maybe” with various Court of Federal Claims decisions divided over the issue. But in a precedential September 16, 2026, decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Island Creek Associates, LLC v. United States resolved this split, holding that IDIQ contract awardees lack standing to challenge the IDIQ awards to fellow competitors.

Continue Reading Federal Circuit Resolves Court Split Over IDIQ Awardee Standing
Photo of Lyndsay GortonPhoto of Brian Tully McLaughlinPhoto of William TuckerPhoto of Alexandra BrooksPhoto of Amanda McDowell

On September 1, 2026, the Eleventh Circuit issued its long-anticipated decision in U.S. ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates LLC, holding that the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act are constitutional because relators are not officers of the United States who occupy continuing positions established by law. The decision overturned the…

Photo of Olivia LynchPhoto of Michael SamuelsPhoto of Amy Laderberg O'SullivanPhoto of Zachary SchroederPhoto of Bryana Bowman

On September 21, 2026, the Small Business Administration announced an extension of the comment period for two previously proposed rules that, as currently constructed, would significantly expand the pool of entities eligible to qualify for small business set-aside procurements. The extension is slated to be formally published on September 24, 2026.  While the comment period…

Photo of Nkechi KanuPhoto of Brian Tully McLaughlinPhoto of Kate GrowleyPhoto of Matthew FerraroPhoto of Jessica ChaoPhoto of Jacob HarrisonPhoto of Ajan JayantPhoto of Bryan Dewan

In recent years, the U.S. federal government has taken significant interest in the cybersecurity compliance of its contractor base. In 2025 alone, the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Civil Cyber-Fraud Initiative recovered more than $50 million across nine False Claims Act (FCA) cybersecurity fraud settlements, and it has secured almost 20 settlements since its launch in October 2021. Because most defendants facing FCA liability for alleged cybersecurity noncompliance enter into pre-litigation settlements, the last court decision in a cybersecurity FCA case was in 2022. However, earlier this month, on September 2, 2026, in  United States ex rel. Pannek v. Archer Daniels Midland Co., No. 23-cv-15145, 2026 WL 2593317 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 2, 2026), Judge Sunil R. Harjani of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois granted a motion to dismiss on materiality grounds and offered additional guidance on what a plaintiff must allege to adequately state an FCA cybersecurity claim.

Continue Reading In a First, District Court Dismisses FCA Cybersecurity Complaint for Lack of Materiality
Photo of Michael SamuelsPhoto of Olivia LynchPhoto of Lillie Drenth

The General Services Administration (GSA) has begun sending out email notifications of a “known glitch” affecting certain System for Award Management (SAM) registrations as far back as spring 2026.

Continue Reading GSA Issues Notice of “Glitch” and Recommends Contractors Validate Small Business Status Representations on SAM.gov 
Photo of Cherie Owen

In Aim for AdVantage, LLC, GAO dismissed a protest as a sanction after finding that the protester had materially misrepresented the facts underlying its challenge to the rejection of its proposal. The protester claimed it had spent two hours trying to submit its proposal through the agency’s digital portal before the deadline, only to be thwarted by undisclosed system limitations.  But a forensic review of the protester’s account activity told a very different story – one in which the protester had not even attempted to access the portal until nearly an hour after the deadline had passed. GAO’s decision to dismiss the protest as a sanction for these misrepresentations serves as a stark warning: fabricating facts in a GAO protest may result in serious consequences.

Continue Reading Lying Gets You Nowhere: GAO Dismisses Protest Built on Fabricated Facts
Photo of Daniel R. FormanPhoto of Cherie OwenPhoto of James G. Peyster

The U.S. Government Accountability Office’s (GAO) recent decision in Viderity Inc.—Costs, B-424422.5, Sept. 1, 2026, offers useful insight into what constitutes a legally sufficient conflict of interest investigation. The decision arose in an unusual procedural posture: Viderity initially protested, alleging that an agency evaluator had a personal conflict of interest. After the agency took corrective action, Viderity filed a cost entitlement claim requesting that GAO direct the agency to reimburse Viderity’s protest costs. In evaluating that claim, GAO assessed whether Viderity’s underlying protest ground was “clearly meritorious.”

Continue Reading GAO Indicates Reasonable Conflict of Interest Investigation Must Include Inquiry of Involved Firm
Photo of Peter J. Eyre

Focus on Congressional Investigations

This is a special edition focusing on congressional investigations and the risk for government contractors in today’s environment, and is hosted by Peter Eyre and Jamie Bair. Crowell & Moring’s “Fastest 5 Minutes” is a biweekly podcast that provides a brief summary of significant government contracts legal and regulatory developments that…

Photo of Nkechi KanuPhoto of Kate GrowleyPhoto of Jacob HarrisonPhoto of Bryan Dewan

On September 2, 2026, the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), through its Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO), released two new Notices on the topic of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI): ISOO Notices 2026-07 and 2026-08. 

Continue Reading New ISOO Guidance Directs Federal Agencies to Provide More CUI Guidance to Contractors
Photo of Cherie Owen

The following is an installment in Crowell & Moring’s Bid Protest Sustain of the Month Series. In this series, Crowell’s Government Contracts Practice keeps you up to date with a summary of one of the most notable bid protest sustain decisions each month. Below, Crowell Consultant (and former GAO Bid Protest Hearing Officer) Cherie Owen discusses GAO’s decision in LJR Solutions, LLC, B-424487, Aug. 14, 2026, where GAO sustained a small business’s challenge to the National Institutes of Health’s decision not to set aside a procurement for small business concerns.

Continue Reading August 2026 Bid Protest Sustain of the Month: Agency’s Rule of Two Set-Aside Determination Failed on Multiple Fronts