Government Contracts Legal Forum

Daniel R. Forman

Daniel R. Forman

Daniel R. Forman is a partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Crowell & Moring and is a co-chair of the Government Contracts Group. Dan’s practice focuses on a wide variety of government procurement law, including bid protests, False Claims Act and qui tam litigation, investigations of potential civil and criminal matters, ethics and compliance, contract claims and disputes, GSA schedule contracting, and small disadvantaged business contracting. He is also experienced in negotiating and drafting teaming agreements and subcontracts, as well as providing counseling on the interpretation of FAR clauses and Solicitations. Dan’s practice also focuses on state and local procurement matters, including State False Claims Act issues, lobbying and contingency payment compliance. He has been involved in bid protest litigation in six states and the District of Columbia.

Read Daniel's bio on Crowell & Moring's website

Subscribe to all posts by Daniel R. Forman

DoD Implements New Enhanced Debriefing Procedures from the 2018 NDAA

Posted in Legal Developments
On March 22, 2018, the Department of Defense (DoD), Office of the Under Secretary of Defense issued a Class Deviation letter to the heads of all Department of Defense agencies requiring, effective immediately, that every DoD agency ensure that its contracting officers implement the recommendations for enhanced post-award debriefings set forth in Section 818 of… Continue Reading

Weeding Out Bad Contractors — The Government’s Push to Enhance its Suspension and Debarment Function

Posted in Suspension & Debarment
It should come as no surprise to those involved in the federal procurement marketplace that, under the Obama administration, the Government has sought to strengthen accountability in government contracting, and, to that end, has resorted to a number of tools in the Government’s arsenal for combating fraud, waste, and abuse. The latest such effort is… Continue Reading

The COFC Rejects the Government’s Doublespeak on Standing to Challenge In-Sourcing Decisions

Posted in In-Sourcing
In Santa Barbara Applied Research, Inc. (“SBAR”) v. United States, No. 11-86C (May 4, 2011), Judge Firestone of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“COFC”) ultimately upheld the Air Force’s in-sourcing decision on facts that are largely sui generis. However, before ruling in the Air Force’s favor on the merits of the cost comparison,… Continue Reading

Organizational Conflict of Interest Rules – A Growing State Trend

Posted in Organizational Conflict of Interest
By now, most government contractors are (or most certainly should be) aware of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”) provisions governing organizational conflicts of interest. While OCIs have been a hot issue for some time in the federal procurement world, OCIs are becoming an increasing risk area in the state procurement arena as well.    By way of… Continue Reading