Labor & Employment

Subscribe to Labor & Employment via RSS
Photo of Dan WolffPhoto of Sharmistha DasPhoto of Anuj VohraPhoto of Amy Laderberg O'SullivanPhoto of Nicholas Roberti

Last week, we wrote that concerns about excessive, unchecked executive branch power resulting from the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. CASA—which declared universal/nationwide injunctions likely exceeded district courts’ equitable authority under FRCP 65—felt premature, because there were a number of other levers district courts could pull to deliver the equivalent of nationwide injunctive relief. We discussed how Section 705 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) is one such lever. That section authorizes courts to “postpone the effective date” of a challenged agency action pending judicial review utilizing the same four-factor test applicable to requests for injunctive relief.Continue Reading Meet the New Nationwide Injunction. Same as the Old Nationwide Injunction.

Photo of Cherie OwenPhoto of Skye MathiesonPhoto of Amy Laderberg O'Sullivan

On May 29, 2025, the Department of Labor (DOL) announced that it will begin a “phased pause in operations at contractor-operated Job Corps centers nationwide.” The pause is anticipated to occur within a month—by June 30, 2025. To effectuate this pause, DOL has suspended operations at approximately one hundred contractor-operated Job Corps centers.  DOL instructed centers to suspend program activities, transition students home, and implement other transition plans. According to DOL’s Frequently Asked Questions, the Department anticipates that  students will transition to “state and local workforce partners” including American Job Centers and the Labor Exchange system in their home state.Continue Reading Job Corps Centers: Widespread Contract Terminations due to Agency’s “Pause”

Photo of Ellen Moran DwyerPhoto of Peter J. EyrePhoto of Kris D. MeadePhoto of Anuj VohraPhoto of Ted North

Late on Friday, a federal judge in Maryland issued a preliminary injunction pausing certain elements of the Trump Administration’s two recent executive orders (“EOs”) addressing “illegal DEI programs.” The two EOs, Exec. Order 14151, Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing (the “J20 Order”) and Exec. Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (“J21 Order”), contain a number of provisions that, among other things, direct the federal government to dismantle “illegal DEI programs” within federal agencies and federal contractors. Please refer to our prior alert on these EOs for a full breakdown of the provisions in each.Continue Reading Administration’s DEI Rollback Efforts Paused by Federal Judge

Photo of Toni Michelle JacksonPhoto of Trina Fairley BarlowPhoto of Derick D. Dailey

On February 13, 2025, a coalition of sixteen state attorneys general issued a “Multi-State Guidance Concerning Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility Employment Initiatives” (the Guidance). Led by Attorney General Andrea Campbell of Massachusetts and Attorney General Kwame Raoul of Illinois, and joined by the Attorneys General of Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Vermont, the Guidance is a direct response to concerns from the private sector in the aftermath of President Trump’s recent Executive Order 14173, which  directed federal agencies “to encourage the private sector to end illegal discrimination and preferences, including DEI.” The Guidance clarifies “the state of the law for businesses, nonprofits, and other organizations operating” in their respective states.Continue Reading State Attorneys General Issue Multistate Guidance on Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility

Photo of Trina Fairley BarlowPhoto of Christine B. HawesPhoto of Ted North

On Inauguration Day, President Trump issued a flurry of executive orders.  Among the first he signed was the Initial Rescissions Of Harmful Executive Orders and Actions Executive Order (the “Rescinding EO”). This directive rescinded 78 executive orders issued by the Biden Administration.  The revocation of one in particular, Executive Order 14055 of November 18, 2021 Non-displacement of Qualified Workers Under Service Contracts (the “EO 14055”), will have an immediate impact on federal contractors performing and bidding on Service Contracts.Continue Reading Executive Order Underpinning SCA Contractors’ Right of First Refusal Rescinded By Trump Administration

Photo of Peter J. EyrePhoto of Kris D. Meade
Labor and Employment under the New AdministrationThis week’s special edition focuses on what contractors can expect from the incoming administration relating to labor and employment matters, and is hosted by Peter Eyre and Kris Meade. Crowell & Moring’s “Fastest 5 Minutes” is a biweekly podcast that provides a brief summary of significant government contracts legal
…
Photo of Trina Fairley BarlowPhoto of Peter J. EyrePhoto of Christine B. HawesPhoto of Alexandra Barbee-Garrett

On June 24, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a nationwide preliminary injunction, stopping the U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”) from enforcing three key elements of regulations related to the Davis-Bacon Act and Related Acts (“DBA” or “Act”).  The court order issued in Associated General Contractors v. U.S. Department of Labor will provide significant comfort and certainty to contractors that perform work on federally funded construction projects.Continue Reading Nationwide Injunction Halts Key Provisions of Davis-Bacon Act Regulations