Photo of Olivia LynchPhoto of Michael SamuelsPhoto of Jon O'ConnellPhoto of Joachim B. SteinbergPhoto of Jacob Canter

On June 23, 2023, a coalition of companies, including venture capital firms like Kleiner Perkins, General Catalyst and Founders Fund, and start-up defense technology companies, published an open letter to the Department of Defense (DoD), addressed to Secretary Lloyd J. Austin, petitioning DoD to consider procurement reform to help “overcome barriers to innovation.”  The group asserts these barriers create “antiquated methods for developing requirements and selecting technologies that have drastically limited” DoD’s access to “the best commercial innovation.”  In particular, the coalition endorsed adopting four recommendations pulled from a report by The Atlantic Council, a non-partisan international affairs think tank.

First, the letter suggests that DoD modernize to align with the 21stcentury industrial base.  The letter acknowledges that DoD has already taken a strong step in this direction by establishing the Defense Innovation Unit (DIU), which reports directly to Secretary Austin and whose mission is to accelerate the adoption of commercial technology. The coalition also encouraged DoD to provide DIU with additional staffing and resources to tap into the non-traditional defense industrial base, reinforce “buy before build” commercial practices, and help DoD speed up validation and approval of needs and funding.

Next, the letter advocates for enhancements to the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program, under which DoD funds small business independent research and development (IR&D) work through several phases of funding that is intended to commercialize developing technology.  Perhaps most significantly, the letter calls for the removal of barriers for small businesses with venture capital or large business funding to compete for SBIR contracts and grants.  While no specifics were provided, the coalition seems to be advocating for changes to the eligibility requirements and affiliation rules specific to the SBIR Program, which could allow for greater investment in small businesses without risking the contractor’s ability to qualify for a SBIR award.  The coalition also suggests “direct-to-Phase III grants,” i.e., direct to the commercialization phase, as well as other flexible funding vehicles including a Strategic Funding Increase Program, which would match customer and private funding, as well as pilot projects for external capital funding from the Office of Strategic Capital. 

The coalition also suggests encouraging tech companies to contract with DoD by raising the threshold for cost accounting standard (CAS) coverage to “at least” $100 million, revising or expanding the commercial item CAS exemption, and providing more procurement funds for research and development.  Other suggestions include investment in modernizing the System for Award Management portal to improve its design and usability and streamlining processes related to security clearances.

Finally, the letter suggests establishing a bridge fund for demonstrated technologies, such as a $250 million pilot fund to scale technologies “demonstrated at operational exercises” in order to overcome the “valley of death,” where promising new technologies often fail to receive adequate funding and die out before they can be transitioned into use under major defense programs.

It remains to be seen if the coalition’s letter will elicit a response from DoD and whether any of the suggested measures will gain traction and result in procurement reforms that might further increase venture capital investment in non-traditional and start-up government contractors.  In any event, there are already some promising signs.  On June 22, 2023, just one day before the coalition released its letter, the House Appropriation Committee approved a $1 billion allocation to establish a “hedge portfolio” of commercial, innovative non-traditional solutions for weapons systems and suppliers that would be outside the traditional defense industrial base and would be managed by DIU. 

The Crowell Government Contracts and Corporate team will continue to monitor for additional developments showing a renewed DoD investment in non-traditional, innovative contractors, technologies, and solutions.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Olivia Lynch Olivia Lynch

Olivia L. Lynch is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s Government Contracts Group in the Washington, D.C. office.

General Government Contracts Counseling. Olivia advises government contractors on navigating the procurement process, compliance and ethics, commercial item contracting, accessibility, supply chain assurance, and…

Olivia L. Lynch is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s Government Contracts Group in the Washington, D.C. office.

General Government Contracts Counseling. Olivia advises government contractors on navigating the procurement process, compliance and ethics, commercial item contracting, accessibility, supply chain assurance, and various aspects of state and local procurement law.

Photo of Michael Samuels Michael Samuels

Michael Samuels is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s Government Contracts Group. His practice involves counseling and representing government contractors on a wide range of issues.

Photo of Jacob Canter Jacob Canter

Jacob Canter is an attorney in the San Francisco office of Crowell & Moring. He is a member of the Litigation and Privacy & Cybersecurity groups. Jacob’s areas of emphasis include technology-related litigation, involving competition, cybersecurity and digital crimes, copyright, trademark, and patent…

Jacob Canter is an attorney in the San Francisco office of Crowell & Moring. He is a member of the Litigation and Privacy & Cybersecurity groups. Jacob’s areas of emphasis include technology-related litigation, involving competition, cybersecurity and digital crimes, copyright, trademark, and patent, as well as general complex commercial matters.

Jacob graduated from the University California, Berkeley School of Law in 2018, where he launched Berkeley’s election law outreach program and pro bono project. He joins the firm after a year of practice at an international law firm in Washington, D.C., and a year clerking in the Southern District of New York for the Hon. Lorna G. Schofield. Jacob was exposed to and provided support in a variety of complex substantive and procedural legal topics during the clerkship, including trade secrets, insurance/reinsurance, contracts, class actions, privacy, intellectual property, and arbitrability.