Photo of Stephanie CrawfordPhoto of Jonathan M. BakerPhoto of Paul FreemanPhoto of Robert L. LaFrankiePhoto of John Brew

On June 6, 2022, President Biden issued a White House Fact Sheet (“Fact Sheet”) outlining President Biden’s “Bold Executive Action to Spur Domestic Clean Energy Manufacturing” along with five related Defense Production Act (“DPA”) Presidential Determinations[1] (“Presidential Determinations”) and a Declaration of Emergency and Authorization for Temporary Extensions of Time and Duty-Free Importation of Solar Cells and Module from Southeast Asia (the “Declaration”).  The Fact Sheet states the President is (1) authorizing use of the DPA to accelerate domestic production of clean energy technologies; (2) encouraging domestic solar manufacturing capacity through the use of master supply agreements with enhanced domestic preferences; and (3) creating a two-year trade regulation bridge as domestic manufacturing for solar products scales up.  The White House stated that these actions are being taken to lower energy costs, reduce risks to the power grid, and mitigate climate change.  The Department of Energy (“DOE”) also released a statement on June 6 about the DPA Presidential Determinations which describes DOE’s concerns with regard to each material or technology for which a determination was issued.  The statements made by the White House and DOE also make clear that these actions to employ the DPA are part of the Administration’s broader “all of government” approach to addressing Environmental Justice, with the intention to “strongly encourage projects with environmental justice outcomes that empower the clean energy transition in low income communities historically overburdened by legacy pollution.”

Defense Production Act

The five Presidential Determinations together assert that insulation, electroliers, fuel cells, platinum group metals, electric heat pumps, transformers, electric power grid components, and solar photovoltaic modules and module components (including ingots, wafers, solar glass, and cells) are industrial resources, materials, or critical technology items essential to the national defense.  The Determinations allow the DOE to enter arrangements under Section 303 of the DPA (“Title III”), 50 U.S.C. § 4533, for purposes of developing domestic industry sufficient to meet U.S. requirements for these various products and to avoid product shortfalls that would impair national defense capabilities.  Section 303 funding agreements can be for specific purchases of industrial resources or critical technology items for government use or resale; purchase commitments for the same; for the encouragement of exploration, development, and mining of critical and strategic materials or other materials; for development of production capabilities, and for increased use of emerging technologies to support the transition from research and development to commercial or national defense applications.

In 2012, Executive Order 13603 delegated broad DPA authorities to the DOE under Title I (priorities and allocations authorities), Title III (expansion of productive capacity, and supply), and Title VII (voluntary agreements, among other things).  The June 6 Presidential Determinations provide additional item determinations and guidance against which DOE can exercise its DPA authority.

The 2-year Solar Tariff Exemption

The Declaration authorizes a 24-month tariff exemption for solar cells and modules, exported from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam, and that are not already subject to an antidumping or countervailing duty order as of June 6, 2022.  This action helps to temporarily resolve the uncertainty caused by an ongoing investigation by the Department of Commerce to determine if supply routes to and from these countries were set up to circumvent the tariffs imposed on solar equipment produced in China. The possibility of having to pay retroactive tariffs combined with the overall supply chain and labor challenges related to the global pandemic put many solar development projects on hold and lead to others being cancelled.

New solar projects benefiting from the tariff relief provided by the Declaration could also benefit from the 26% investment tax credit (“ITC”) provided that the projects are started before the end of 2022 and placed in service before January 1, 2026.  For projects started in 2023 and placed in service before January 1, 2026, the rate drops to 22%.  For commercial projects started after 2023, the rate drops permanently to 10% and residential projects would no longer be eligible for an ITC unless the richer and expanded credit provisions from the late Build Back Better bill are reintroduced as part of other legislation.

Impact

It is unclear what the full impact of the Presidential Determinations will be on the energy industry in general or over what timeline any such impacts will occur. Similar to executive and legislative actions taken at the end of 2020, end of 2021, and beginning of 2022 regarding critical minerals supply chain issues, these presidential actions will support long-term development of certain energy technologies and materials.  However, more immediately, given the critical importance of tax equity arrangements in solar project financing, President Biden’s solar tariff relief provides a much needed opening for the solar industry to take advantage of the higher tax credit rates and to rebuild the solar development pipeline. 

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Stephanie Crawford Stephanie Crawford

Stephanie L. Crawford is a counsel in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office, practicing in the Government Contracts group.

Stephanie’s practice focuses on mergers and acquisitions, contract and regulatory compliance reviews, and counseling on supply chain, sourcing, and national security issues. Her practice…

Stephanie L. Crawford is a counsel in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office, practicing in the Government Contracts group.

Stephanie’s practice focuses on mergers and acquisitions, contract and regulatory compliance reviews, and counseling on supply chain, sourcing, and national security issues. Her practice supports clients in the aerospace & defense, communications, energy, information technology, and consumer products sectors.

Photo of Jonathan M. Baker Jonathan M. Baker

Jonathan M. Baker is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office. He practices in the Government Contracts Group.

Jon advises clients on a wide array of government contracts legal issues, including both federal and state bid protests, prime-sub disputes, government contracts…

Jonathan M. Baker is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office. He practices in the Government Contracts Group.

Jon advises clients on a wide array of government contracts legal issues, including both federal and state bid protests, prime-sub disputes, government contracts due diligence and transactions, regulatory compliance, and contract terminations. Jon’s practice has a notable emphasis on technology-related issues, including counseling clients in the areas of patent and data rights, responding to government challenges to technical data and computer software rights assertions, and litigating cases involving complex and cutting edge technologies. Jon also provides guidance on national security matters, such as National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual compliance and facility and security clearance matters. In addition, Jon has advised clients on local government contract negotiation, internal and government investigations regarding potential False Claims Act issues, and export violations. Jon is also actively involved in the firm’s pro bono program, having litigated prisoner neglect, parental rights termination, and landlord-tenant matters.

Photo of Paul Freeman Paul Freeman

Paul Freeman is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s New York office and a member of the firm’s Environment & Natural Resources and Government Contracts groups. He brings two decades of diverse experience advising clients in the energy, maritime, and aerospace and defense…

Paul Freeman is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s New York office and a member of the firm’s Environment & Natural Resources and Government Contracts groups. He brings two decades of diverse experience advising clients in the energy, maritime, and aerospace and defense industries on a range of issues, with a primary emphasis on matters involving enforcement defense, litigation, and risk management.

Paul routinely advises clients in response to investigations by, or inquiries from, a range of regulators, primarily the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), and also including the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Internal Revenue Service, the U.S. Department of Defense Inspector General, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and state attorneys general.

Photo of Robert L. LaFrankie Robert L. LaFrankie

Robert L. LaFrankie is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Group and resident in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office. Bob regularly advises manufacturers, exporters, and importers in all aspects of international trade and customs proceedings before various government agencies, courts, and…

Robert L. LaFrankie is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Group and resident in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office. Bob regularly advises manufacturers, exporters, and importers in all aspects of international trade and customs proceedings before various government agencies, courts, and international tribunals. He focuses on trade-related litigation and counseling, including trade remedy proceedings and U.S. Customs compliance and enforcement issues. Bob has successfully defended numerous clients located throughout Asia, Europe, and the Americas that produce or import a diverse range of products, including flat-rolled and specialty steel products and components, chemicals and plastics, frozen and canned food products, paper products, motor vehicle parts and components, specialty valves and valve systems, disposable lighters, petrochemical and renewable fuels, anti-friction bearings, and other manufactured products. In addition to litigation and compliance counseling, Bob engages in strategic trade remedy and customs planning activities for clients, particularly for companies with global sourcing, manufacturing, and export/import operations. He also advises companies with regard to NAFTA compliance issues and related audits of client facilities.

Photo of John Brew John Brew

John Brew is the co-chair of Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Group and a partner in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office. He has extensive experience in import and export trade regulation, and he regularly advises corporations, trade associations, foreign governments, and non-governmental organizations…

John Brew is the co-chair of Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Group and a partner in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office. He has extensive experience in import and export trade regulation, and he regularly advises corporations, trade associations, foreign governments, and non-governmental organizations on matters involving customs administration, enforcement, compliance, litigation, legislation and policy.

John represents clients in proceedings at the administrative and judicial levels, as well as before Congress and the international bureaucracies that handle customs and trade matters. He advises clients on all substantive import regulatory issues handled by U.S. Customs and Border Protection and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, such as classification, valuation, origin, marking, tariff preference programs, other agency regulations, admissibility, import restrictions, quotas, drawback, audits, prior disclosures, penalties, investigations, Importer Self Assessment and Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism programs, importations under bond, the Jones Act, vessel repairs, and foreign trade zone matters.