Photo of Stephanie CrawfordPhoto of Lyndsay GortonPhoto of John E. McCarthy Jr.Photo of Jonathan M. Baker

In an effort to boost the domestic mining industry for critical minerals, on March 31, 2022, President Biden issued Presidential Determination 2022-11, the Memorandum on Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (“Presidential Determination”).  The Presidential Determination states that sustainable and responsible domestic mining, beneficiation, and value-added processing of strategic and critical materials for the production of large-capacity batteries, including lithium, nickel, cobalt, graphite, and manganese, are essential to national defense.  The Presidential Determination will allow the Department of Defense (“DoD”) to pursue various investment, purchase commitment, and purchase vehicles to support strategic and critical material mining and production in the United States pursuant to Title III of the Defense Production Act (“DPA”).

Defense Production Act Title III

The DPA Title III, Section 303 authorities are intended to provide the President broad latitude in supporting critical domestic industrial base capabilities.  While other parts of the DPA concern loans, prioritization orders, and allocation orders, Title III is focused on alternative domestic investment options.  It is concerned with the expansion of productive capacity and supply in the United States rather than prioritized procurement or allocation.  Under Title III generally,[1] the Government may:

  • make provision for purchases of or commitments to purchase an industrial resource or critical technology item for Government use or resale;
  • make provision for the development of production capabilities, the increased use of emerging technologies in security program applications, and the rapid transition of emerging technologies;
  • make subsidy payments for raw or nonprocessed materials from high-cost sources under certain conditions;
  • encourage the exploration, development, and mining of strategic and critical materials;
  • make provision for the development of substitutes for strategic and critical materials, components, technology, and other resources to aid national defense;
  • procure and install additional equipment, facilities, processes, or improvements to plants, factories, and other industrial facilities owned by the federal government;
  • procure and install Government-owned equipment in privately-owned plants, factories, and other industrial facilities;
  • provide for the modification or expansion of privately-owned facilities, including the modification or improvement of production processes;
  • permit agencies engaged in procurement for national defense to restrict solicitations to reliable and/or domestics sources; to stockpile critical components; and to develop substitutes for critical components or technology.

Title III, Section 303 requires certain determinations to be made by the President before the authorities therein become available.[2]

Effect of Presidential Determination 2022-11

Pursuant to the Presidential Determination, the DoD is to exercise DPA Title III, Section 303 authorities, including purchases, purchase commitments, equipment transfer, and facility modification, among other things, to encourage private industry to meet this government need for domestic production of critical materials.  This authority is to be exercised in consultation with the Departments of Interior, Agriculture, and Energy, and other agencies as deemed appropriate.[3]  DoD is required to support feasibility studies for the strategic and critical material projects undertaken, which are to address mature mining, beneficiation, and value-added processing projects; by-product and co-product production at existing mining, mine waste reclamation, and other industrial facilities; and mining, beneficiation, and value-added processing modernization to increase productivity, environmental sustainability, and workforce safety.[4]

Key Takeaways

This action follows a June 2021 report on defense critical supply chain vulnerabilities conducted by DoD and the Departments of Commerce, Energy, and Health and Human Services pursuant to Executive Order 14017, which recommended the Government use the DPA to boost domestic mineral production.  The Department of Energy’s June 2021 National Blueprint for Lithium Batteries has called for the United States and its partners to establish a secure supply chain for lithium and other electric vehicle battery components by 2030.  And the Presidential Determination comes on the heels of the Administration’s Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act that also included significant measures such as grants, loan guarantees, and streamlined regulations to address domestic critical minerals supply chain vulnerabilities.  The development of domestic supply chains for critical minerals, which are key components in renewable energy applications and electric vehicle batteries, is essential for the Biden administration to meet its goal of having the U.S. government transition to a zero-emission vehicle fleet by 2035 and net-zero emissions economywide by 2050.

You can access Crowell & Moring’s primer webinar here discussing the DPA.  Additionally, you can find Crowell & Moring’s summaries of the DPA here and Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) here.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Stephanie Crawford Stephanie Crawford

Stephanie L. Crawford is a counsel in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office, practicing in the Government Contracts group.

Stephanie’s practice focuses on mergers and acquisitions, contract and regulatory compliance reviews, and counseling on supply chain, sourcing, and national security issues. Her practice…

Stephanie L. Crawford is a counsel in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office, practicing in the Government Contracts group.

Stephanie’s practice focuses on mergers and acquisitions, contract and regulatory compliance reviews, and counseling on supply chain, sourcing, and national security issues. Her practice supports clients in the aerospace & defense, communications, energy, information technology, and consumer products sectors.

Photo of Lyndsay Gorton Lyndsay Gorton

Lyndsay Gorton is a Government Contracts counsel in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office. Her practice focuses on government contracts litigation and counseling, including government investigations, fraud matters under the False Claims Act, bid protests, and federal and state regulatory compliance. In addition…

Lyndsay Gorton is a Government Contracts counsel in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office. Her practice focuses on government contracts litigation and counseling, including government investigations, fraud matters under the False Claims Act, bid protests, and federal and state regulatory compliance. In addition to her primary government contracts practice, Lyndsay has federal court litigation experience representing a broad variety of clients in commercial litigation matters, and has led and managed teams at every stage of litigation, including discovery, dispositive motion practice, trial, and settlement. She also uses her litigation experience to assist her clients with internal investigations, risk management, and compliance.

Photo of John E. McCarthy Jr. John E. McCarthy Jr.

John E. McCarthy, Jr. is a partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Crowell & Moring and member of the firm’s Government Contracts Group. John has spent more than thirty years litigating all forms of government contracts cases for both large and small…

John E. McCarthy, Jr. is a partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Crowell & Moring and member of the firm’s Government Contracts Group. John has spent more than thirty years litigating all forms of government contracts cases for both large and small government contractors, with a particular emphasis on bid protests. Because of John’s strong engineering background, he has particular experience in technology related issues, including litigation regarding complex technology and data rights, patent and other intellectual property issues.

Photo of Jonathan M. Baker Jonathan M. Baker

Jonathan M. Baker is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office. He practices in the Government Contracts Group.

Jon advises clients on a wide array of government contracts legal issues, including both federal and state bid protests, prime-sub disputes, government contracts…

Jonathan M. Baker is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office. He practices in the Government Contracts Group.

Jon advises clients on a wide array of government contracts legal issues, including both federal and state bid protests, prime-sub disputes, government contracts due diligence and transactions, regulatory compliance, and contract terminations. Jon’s practice has a notable emphasis on technology-related issues, including counseling clients in the areas of patent and data rights, responding to government challenges to technical data and computer software rights assertions, and litigating cases involving complex and cutting edge technologies. Jon also provides guidance on national security matters, such as National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual compliance and facility and security clearance matters. In addition, Jon has advised clients on local government contract negotiation, internal and government investigations regarding potential False Claims Act issues, and export violations. Jon is also actively involved in the firm’s pro bono program, having litigated prisoner neglect, parental rights termination, and landlord-tenant matters.