Photo of Peter J. EyrePhoto of Trina Fairley BarlowPhoto of Issac Schabes

On November 18, 2021, President Biden signed an executive order, “Executive Order on Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers Under Service Contracts” requiring, in most instances, that federal Service contracts and solicitations for such contracts include a clause which mandates that the awardee (and its subcontractors) of a follow-on Service contract for “same or similar services,” must offer employment to “qualified workers” on the predecessor contract. In this context, a “Service contract” means any contract, contract-like instrument, or subcontract for services covered by the Service Contract Act of 1965 (41 U.S.C. §§ 6701–6707).

This executive order generally affords a right of first refusal to service employees, (as that term is defined under the Service Contract Act), working on a predecessor contract if those employees would otherwise lose their jobs as a result of the predecessor contract’s termination or expiration.  The executive order is intended to avoid the need for a carryover work force and “provides the Federal Government with the benefits of an experienced and well-trained work force that is familiar with the Federal Government’s personnel, facilities, and requirements.” The White House also released a fact sheet highlighting that the executive order advances the administration’s equity goals, as service contract workers are disproportionality women and workers of color. The executive order provides agencies with the ability to grant exceptions to this rule, pursuant to specific limitations, and empowers the Department of Labor with enforcement authority to prescribe sanctions and remedies, including debarment in instances of willful violations.

The executive order contemplates that the outgoing contractor must furnish the Contracting Officer a list of the names of all service employees working under this contract and its subcontracts during the last month of contract performance. The executive order also notes that “when an agency prepares a solicitation for a service contract that succeeds a contract for performance of the same or similar work, the agency shall consider whether performance of the work in the same locality or localities in which the contract is currently being performed is reasonably necessary to ensure economical and efficient provision of services.” If such a determination is made, the agency can include a requirement or preference in the solicitation for the successor contract that it be performed in the same locality or localities.

The executive order directs the Department of Labor to issue final regulations implementing the requirements of the order within 180 days and that following the issuance of such regulations, the FAR Council is directed to amend the Federal Acquisition Regulation accordingly. Although only solicitations issued after the FAR Council promulgates its final regulations will be required to include this clause, agencies are already “strongly encouraged, to the extent permitted by law” to amend existing solicitations to account for the new rule.

The executive order essentially reverts back to the rules that were in effect before the previous administration revoked them in late 2019. Critically, as noted in the fact sheet, although the original rule only applied to successor contracts that were performed at the “same location,” the executive order goes further in removing this requirement “to account for the flexible nature of service sector work in today’s economy.”

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Peter J. Eyre Peter J. Eyre

Peter J. Eyre is a partner and co-chair of Crowell & Moring’s Government Contracts Group. He is also a member of the firm’s Management Board. Peter was named to BTI Consulting Group’s list of “Client Service All-Stars” in 2016, 2017, and 2019 and…

Peter J. Eyre is a partner and co-chair of Crowell & Moring’s Government Contracts Group. He is also a member of the firm’s Management Board. Peter was named to BTI Consulting Group’s list of “Client Service All-Stars” in 2016, 2017, and 2019 and has been named an Acritas Star, Acritas Stars Independently Rated Lawyers (2016, 2017, 2019). He is nationally ranked by Chambers USA in Government Contracts since 2014, and by Super Lawyers since 2017.

Photo of Issac Schabes Issac Schabes

Issac D. Schabes is an associate in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office, where he is a member of the Government Contracts Group.

Prior to joining the firm, Issac clerked for the Honorable Matthew H. Solomson on the U.S. Court of Federal Claims and…

Issac D. Schabes is an associate in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office, where he is a member of the Government Contracts Group.

Prior to joining the firm, Issac clerked for the Honorable Matthew H. Solomson on the U.S. Court of Federal Claims and the Honorable Robert N. McDonald on the Maryland Court of Appeals. Issac received his J.D., magna cum laude, from the University of Maryland Carey School of Law, where he graduated Order of the Coif and served as an executive editor for the Maryland Law Review. He received numerous awards, including the Judge Simon E. Sobeloff Prize for Excellence in Constitutional Law. During law school, Issac was a member of a low-income taxpayer clinic team that successfully appealed an IRS assessment resulting in a substantial tax liability reduction, and also interned for the Honorable Beryl A. Howell, Chief Judge, on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and the Honorable Marvin J. Garbis on the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland.