Thomas Humphrey

Thomas Humphrey has no picture

Thomas P. Humphrey is a Partner in the Washington, D.C. office of the law firm of Crowell & Moring. He represents clients in a wide variety of government contracts matters, including bid protests, False Claims Act and qui tam litigation, and investigations of potential criminal matters. Mr. Humphrey specializes in handling computer, telecommunications, and health care bid protest litigation before the GAO and various trial and appellate courts. Mr. Humphrey is a frequent speaker on issues relating to contract formation and litigation of disputes in this area and has authored Federal Publications Briefing Papers on "The Scope of the Source Selection Official's Discretion" (No. 94-5, April 1994) and "Changes in the Notice of Award, Debriefing, and Protest Rules after FASA" (No. 95-10, September 1995). He is active in the Bid Protest Committee of the Public Contract Law Section of the American Bar Association, and served for many years as a Vice-Chair of a committee of the Litigation Section of the American Bar Association. He has been named one of the top lawyers in the government contracts field by Chambers USA.


Articles By This Author

Join Us For a Webinar on the Proposed OCI Rules

Thomas Humphrey

On Thursday, May 20, from 2:00 pm - 3:00 pm ET, please join Tom Humphrey, John McCarthy, and Peter Eyre from Crowell & Moring's Government Contracts Group for an in-depth discussion of the proposed rules, how these rules might impact strategic business decisions, and the implications for bid protests at GAO and the Court of Federal Claims.

The Department of Defense has issued proposed rules (.pdf) regarding organizational conflicts of interest (“OCI”), which would apply to all DoD procurements. Even for non-DoD contractors, these proposed rules merit careful attention because it is likely that the revisions to the FAR OCI provisions (which are currently underway) will closely resemble the proposed DoD rules. The proposed rules generally track decades of GAO and Court of Federal Claims decisions interpreting FAR 9.5. But there are some new elements as well. For instance, if implemented, these new rules would require many contractors to submit extensive disclosures - e.g., "any other work performed on contracts, subcontracts, grants, cooperative agreements, or other transactions within the past five years that is associated with the offer it plans to submit" - to allow agencies to analyze actual and potential OCIs. In addition, the proposed rules, implementing a specific mandate from the Weapons System Acquisition Reform Act of 2009, would prohibit (subject to a few limited exceptions) a contractor performing systems engineering and technical assistance functions for a major acquisition program from participating as a contractor or major subcontractor in the development or construction of a weapon system under such program.

Older Entries